<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Problem with Perfect Ideological Discipline</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.liberalwalrus.com/2006/03/21/the-problem-with-perfect-ideological-discipline/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.liberalwalrus.com/2006/03/21/the-problem-with-perfect-ideological-discipline/</link>
	<description>Large Liberal Commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 20:30:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: The Liberal Walrus &#187; Blog Archive &#187; E.J. Dionne Understands the President</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwalrus.com/2006/03/21/the-problem-with-perfect-ideological-discipline/comment-page-1/#comment-89</link>
		<dc:creator>The Liberal Walrus &#187; Blog Archive &#187; E.J. Dionne Understands the President</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2006 06:27:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwalrus.com/2006/03/21/the-problem-with-perfect-ideological-discipline/#comment-89</guid>
		<description>[...] I know I link to him a lot, but that&#8217;s only because E.J. Dionne is a genius, as proven again in his most recent Washington Post column: Is President Bush the leader of our government, or is he just a right-wing talk-show host? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I know I link to him a lot, but that&#8217;s only because E.J. Dionne is a genius, as proven again in his most recent Washington Post column: Is President Bush the leader of our government, or is he just a right-wing talk-show host? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maryland Conservatarian</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwalrus.com/2006/03/21/the-problem-with-perfect-ideological-discipline/comment-page-1/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>Maryland Conservatarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 13:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwalrus.com/2006/03/21/the-problem-with-perfect-ideological-discipline/#comment-83</guid>
		<description>&quot;Back when debate and disagreement were more common, solutions to the deficit would have seemed easier to reach. Now they are impossible to contemplate without a major adjustment of Congress. Thank ideological discipline for that.&quot;

Of course, it works both ways: replace &quot;deficit&quot; with &quot;abortion debate&quot; and the statement stands, albeit from the other side of the aisle.

That Republicans have &quot;ideological discipline&quot; (and I gotta believe you wish Democrats did more often) is probably a function of the growth of the GOP being so linked to ideology: many of us became Republicans because we are conservative. Democrats are a coalition party with a more traditional makeup of members (as a Catholic, previous generations of my family were always Democrats). 

I think our base is more likely to punish its congressional reps for their lack of ideological discipline - and that will trump any within-the-halls discipline currently on disply.  

BTW - thanks for the link and the kind words above</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Back when debate and disagreement were more common, solutions to the deficit would have seemed easier to reach. Now they are impossible to contemplate without a major adjustment of Congress. Thank ideological discipline for that.&#8221;</p>
<p>Of course, it works both ways: replace &#8220;deficit&#8221; with &#8220;abortion debate&#8221; and the statement stands, albeit from the other side of the aisle.</p>
<p>That Republicans have &#8220;ideological discipline&#8221; (and I gotta believe you wish Democrats did more often) is probably a function of the growth of the GOP being so linked to ideology: many of us became Republicans because we are conservative. Democrats are a coalition party with a more traditional makeup of members (as a Catholic, previous generations of my family were always Democrats). </p>
<p>I think our base is more likely to punish its congressional reps for their lack of ideological discipline &#8211; and that will trump any within-the-halls discipline currently on disply.  </p>
<p>BTW &#8211; thanks for the link and the kind words above</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

