<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reopening the Wiretapping Debate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.liberalwalrus.com/2006/03/04/reopening-the-wiretapping-debate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.liberalwalrus.com/2006/03/04/reopening-the-wiretapping-debate/</link>
	<description>Large Liberal Commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 20:30:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: walrus</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwalrus.com/2006/03/04/reopening-the-wiretapping-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>walrus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Mar 2006 17:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwalrus.com/index.php/2006/03/04/reopening-the-wiretapping-debate/#comment-37</guid>
		<description>It seems to me that, whatever one&#039;s political perspective, it is not news that Tom Daschle&#039;s timeline of events differs from the administration&#039;s.  There are questions about the wiretapping program that it would be newsworthy to investigate, as I mention in the post, but this article adds nothing except to reassure us that it is not clear whether the administration thought it had to seek permission, or if that permission was sought.  

Thanks for reading!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me that, whatever one&#8217;s political perspective, it is not news that Tom Daschle&#8217;s timeline of events differs from the administration&#8217;s.  There are questions about the wiretapping program that it would be newsworthy to investigate, as I mention in the post, but this article adds nothing except to reassure us that it is not clear whether the administration thought it had to seek permission, or if that permission was sought.  </p>
<p>Thanks for reading!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maryland Conservatarian</title>
		<link>http://www.liberalwalrus.com/2006/03/04/reopening-the-wiretapping-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>Maryland Conservatarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Mar 2006 17:16:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liberalwalrus.com/index.php/2006/03/04/reopening-the-wiretapping-debate/#comment-36</guid>
		<description>I had a similar reaction to the story (and headline)....albeit from a different political perspective. I still have no idea how they revived the debate or why but I am again mindful that whatever the administration says, Tom Daschle disagrees.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a similar reaction to the story (and headline)&#8230;.albeit from a different political perspective. I still have no idea how they revived the debate or why but I am again mindful that whatever the administration says, Tom Daschle disagrees.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
